Don’t get bite by the grammar police

It’s a strange thing about grammar that it seems either to send people to sleep, or into fits of self-righteous fury.  I suspect that there’s a link between the two reactions: many of us can’t help but switch off when we find ourselves listening to or reading another rant about how the non-literal use of “literally” is  literally the worst thing ever to have happened to humankind.

Cyanide and Happiness
http://explosm.net/comics/3364/

I came across another example of the power of grammar to generate heat in Trinidad recently. The Ministry of Health has been trying to raise public awareness about the Chikungunya Virus under the following header, featuring the exhortation “DON’T GET BITE!”:

Don't get bite

The inevitable social media grammarstorm which followed featured the kind of outrage that only a nonstandard participle seems to be able to generate, along with the usual examples of McKean’s Law (“any correction of the speech or writing of others will contain at least one grammatical, spelling, or typographical error” – see also Muphry’s Law), such as the following, from a Facebook commenter:

“and they wonder why our children can write a proper sentence far more for a proper essay – dialect is not a language – we speak ENGLISH in Trinidad and Tobago”

Of course, “don’t get bite!” or, as several other commenters pointed out, better perhaps “doh get bite!”, is a perfectly normal, natural way for many Trinbagonians to express the relevant suggestion. The slogan was clearly an attempt to use distinctively Trinbagonian language to get the message across to as many people in the country as possible (though I’m not convinced about how helpful the actual advice is — I haven’t worked out how to avoid getting bitten in the 7+ years I’ve been living here). Whether it was successful is clearly debatable — though, from the amount of discussion it managed to generate, I suspect it has been more effective than many similar campaigns. Perhaps someone at the ministry knew about the power of grammar to generate debate.

shoeboxblog.com
http://www.shoeboxblog.com/?p=14066

The various adverse reactions, contending that much Trinbagonian speech is “not a language”, are certainly wrong. These grammar police seem to believe that the kind of language which is found, say, in soca songs, or on the streets on J’ouvert morning,  is as wild and wassy as some of the wining and grinding which might accompany it, and that it is unconstrained by the kinds of grammatical rules to which more sober and upstanding languages like (standard) English are subject.

In fact, all languages are constrained by grammatical rules. Take, for example, Bunji Garlin‘s Truck on de Road. As Bunji observes in the song:

“We have one big bad stink truck on de road”

Even in this snippet, there is evidence of grammatical rules. Would the song have been such a big hit had Bunji switched the order of the adjectives around a bit? What if he had sung:

one stink bad big truck

Or how about:

one bad stink big truck

If “dialect” is so lawless and rule-free, surely getting on bad with a couple of adjectives shouldn’t be a problem. But, of course, neither of these sounds right, and it’s not just because of my terrible editing. The reason is grammar. Just like all languages, the language of soca is constrained by rules, in this case, rules about the order in which adjectives must appear before a noun.* These are not rules which are taught in school, or which prompt end-is-nigh blustering. In fact, most people are quite unaware of such rules until they are pointed out. It is this sort of grammatical rule that most linguists are primarily interested in. The pleasure of studying grammar comes not from lambasting people for errant apostrophes, though perhaps we would score a few more viral video sensations if, like Weird Al, we did that.**

The antipathy matters because providing crucial public health information in mother languages is a very good idea. This point has been made recently in Jamaica, where many have rightly pointed out that information about Ebola should be given not just in English, but in Jamaican too.***

Grammar matters and it’s everywhere, whether you’re in a classroom or on the road, and whatever the grammar police might have you believe.

* This Slate article gives a nice description of some of the findings of linguists who have looked at the rules governing the order of adjectives in English and other languages around the world.

** There are already many good take-downs of Weird Al’s Word Crimes: check out posts by John McWhorterStan Careyall things linguisticLanguage Log, and some excellent suggestions for teachers who could use the video to help students think critically about language and grammar.

 *** Signed languages shouldn’t be left out either of course. For those interested, see this website which I worked on with T&T’s Deaf Empowerment and Advancement Foundation, providing accessible health information to the Deaf community.

9 thoughts on “Don’t get bite by the grammar police

  1. Excellent post, Ben.

    Trinidadian language snobbery is hilariously unfortunate. Don’t these parents of TEC speaking children know that they’re sending their offspring to school every day to learn the rules of what is essentially a foreign language to them?

    Recently I had a conversation about advertisers and officials using Trinidadian Creole more often in public spheres (the topic was about our signs being “duo-lingual”, having directions or place-markers in Spanish when most Trinidadians do not speak Spanish outside of singing “Alegria, Alegria” for Christmas concerts).

    While I think it will be significantly more useful to have TEC signage, the “problem of the problem of form” comes to mind — the absence of an agreed-upon written form for TEC contributes to its illegitimacy for the language policy police. So to see it written down in a pamphlet would no doubt anger those who associate written English in Trinidad with a standard form.

    So perhaps they would rather not get “bitten”, but in light of the mosquito plague, I’ll advise them to head to the supermarket where they’ll undoubtedly ask if “It have any BOP??”

  2. Time to raise awareness in a land that has always been underinformed and over exposed. Maybe, just maybe, there will be room for Linguistics in the public domain . Your next task would be with the spelling to pronunciation relationship. there are many “experts” there too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s